Adoption according to Indian law is a personal act and hence is governed by the various personal laws of the different religions. Adoption is not permitted according to the personal law of Muslims, Christians, Parsis, and Jews in India. Hence they usually opt for guardianship of a child through the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
Indian citizens can adopt in India under three major legislations: the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act of 1956, the Guardians and Wards Act of 1890 and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act of 2000, amended in 2006.
The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA)
This Act covers Hindus, Buddhists, Jains or Sikhs. Some relevant parts of the Act are:
The Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (GWA)
Before the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act of 2000, this was the only legislation that allowed non-Hindus to adopt. However, this act ended up being the first secular law that allowed for a child to be adopted in India. The salient points of this Act are: \
The parent adopting is a ‘guardian’ and the child is a ‘ward’, meaning that the same rights of a biological child aren’t inherent.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act of 2000, amended in 2006 (JJ Act)
The JJ Act is meant mainly for the care and rehabilitation of children in conflict with the law. There was a need for a law that would allow children the same rights, whether they were adopted or biological. There was also the need for a law that delinked adoption from the religion of the adoptive parent(s). The JJ Act filled this space and a tiny section was added on for adoption.
The Amendment Act of 2006 has since expanded the provisions. The main strengths of this Act are:
Section 2 (aa) of the Act defines adoption as “the process through which the adopted child is permanently separated from his biological parents and becomes the legitimate child of his adoptive parents with all rights, privileges and responsibilities that are attached to the relationship.”
2. Can single parents (man and woman) do that?
Yes Single Parents (man and woman) can adopt a child as per below-given criteria’s:-
Adoptive parents do have to submit a medical report before they officially qualify as parents. The adoption agency will give a detailed list of the medical tests that both parents must undergo. These are general tests to ascertain that the PAP has no major complications. They may have to undergo the following tests:
3. Are there any medical tests that the adopting parents have to go through?
Adoptive parents do have to submit a medical report before they officially qualify as parents. The adoption agency will give a detailed list of the medical tests that both parents must undergo. These are general tests to ascertain that the PAP has no major complications. They may have to undergo the following tests:
Laboratory tests
Hague Convention
For the purpose of implementation of the Convention, in our country, the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment is functioning as the Administrative Ministry and Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA) as the Central Authority.
The following analysis is based on the guidelines given by the Central Adoption Resource Agency.
Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA)
Central Adoption Resource Agency (CARA)
Yes, an adoptive parent is allowed to ask for a specific child, including that of a specific gender, age group, height, etc, and can even choose from among a group of children, if there are many children. However, the final decision rests with the court. An unmarried male, for example, is not allowed to adopt a girl child.
“Court shall direct authorities to recognize minor as a child of parents who has adopted him and confer all benefits that available to the child as per statute.”
Each and every norm of the adoption process spelt out under the Guidelines of 2006, as well as the Guidelines of 2011, has been adhered to, it is found that the apprehension raised by the intervener, though may have been founded on good reasons, have proved themselves wholly unsubstantiated in the present case. If the foreign adoptive parent is otherwise suitable and willing, and consent of the child had also been taken (as in the present case) and the expert bodies engaged in the field are of the view that in the present case the adoption process would end in a successful blending of the child in the family of the appellant in the U.S.A., it is not seen as to how the appellant could be understood to be disqualified or disentitled to the relief (s) sought by her in the proceedings in question. Therefore, having regard to the totality of the facts of the case, the proposed adoption would be beneficial to the child apart from being consistent with the legal entitlement of the foreign adoptive parent.
Complete physical examination
You may also have to submit a brief medical history which will have information about:
Health documents and reports must be supported by a fitness certificate certified by a qualified medical practitioner declaring both adoptive parents as fit and fine, with no genetic disorders or other complications – past or otherwise.
4. What is the age criteria for adoption?
Hindu Maintenance and Adoption Act, 1956·
JUVINILE JUSTICE CARE & PROTECTION OF CHILDREN ACT, 2000GUIDELINES BY CENTRAL ADOPTION RESOURCE AGENCY 2004.
Criteria for Prospective Single Adoptive Parents
5. How are the rules different for an NRI?
India has signed the Hague Convention on Inter-Country Adoption, 1993 on 9 January 2003 and ratified the same on 6 June 2003, with a view to strengthening international cooperation and protection of children placed in inter-country adoption. The Convention recognizes that for the full and harmonious development of his or her personality, the child should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love, and understanding. The Convention also states that the objectives of inter-country adoption should be in the best interests of the child, with respect to their fundamental rights and to prevent abduction, sale, and traffic in children.
In pursuance of the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the Laxmi Kant Pandey v/s Union of India case, (1991) 4 SCC 33, the Central Adoption Resource Agency was established by the Ministry and subsequently the Revised Guidelines for the Adoption of India children were issued in 1995 to provide a framework of rules regulating and monitoring inter-country adoptions. These Guidelines are now applicable all over the country and they provide a uniform mechanism for processing cases of inter-country adoption.
6. Are the adopting parents allowed to choose a child?
Guidelines Governing the Adoption of Children, 2011 issued by Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India.
Chapter III – Guideline number 21:-
7. Are there any agencies which aid in this process?
All the adoption agencies must be recognized by CARA and/or the State Government.
8. case studies?
1) Judgement stating that people in India can adopt as per the laws applicable irrespective of the religion.
In Shabnam Hashmi Vs Union of India & Ors (19 February, 2014)Irrespective of religion any person can adopt under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2000 was ruled by Apex Court in this landmark judgement.
Mr. R.R. George Christopher and Mrs. Kristy Chandra, 2010-2-LW881Application No. 2805 of 2009 in O.P. No. 717 of 2007
Ratio Decidendi
Family – Adoption – Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 – In response to Application filed by Applicants for adoption of minor child, permission was granted to Applicants – However, when Petitioner approached his employer to get due benefits to minor child, employer informed that as a child was not legally adopted, Petitioners were only guardians, no benefits would accrue to adopted child – Hence, this Application – Held, Applicants were Christians – However, Canon Law, which was applicable to Petitioners, provided for adoption if Civil Law of that Country permit same – Applicants had approached Court and got guardianship order – Subsequently applicant performed necessary rites for adopting child – Act provided ‘adoption’ as a means to rehabilitate and socially reintegrate child – Act had empowered the State Government and JJ Board to give child for adoption – Therefore, aspiring parents, who intend to adopt children, without being inhibited by their personal laws, were entitled to adopt child in terms of provisions of the Act – Therefore, Respondents were directed to recognize minor as child of Applicants and confer all service benefits that were available to child of staff of Air India – Application allowed.
2) Responsibility of the Institution
Jay Kevin Salerno Case
Equivalent citations: AIR 1988 Bom 139, 1988 (2) BomCR 239, (1987) 89 BOMLR 521 – Bombay High Court – Bench: S Manohar – date of Judgment: 7 October, 1987
” where the custody of a child is with an institution, the child is kept in a private nursing home or with a private party for better individual care of the child, it does not mean that the institution ceases to have the custody of the child.”
3) No benefits under Article 15 (4) if adopted by Forward Caste
In K. Shantha Kumar v. State of Mysore, Nataraja v. Selection Committee and R. Srinivasa v. Chairman, Selection Committee the Karnataka High Court had consistently held that a boy belonging to a forward caste adopted by a Backward Class citizen is not entitled to the benefit of reservation under Article 15(4)
4) Guidelines for NRI to adopt
LAKSHMI KANT PANDEY Vs UNION OF INDIA 1984 SCR (2) 795FACTS:- The petitioner, an advocate of the Supreme Court addressed a letter in public interest to the Court, complaining about malpractices indulged in by social organisation and voluntary agencies engaged in the work of offering Indian Children in adoption to foreign parents. The petitioner alleged that not only Indian Children of tender age are under the guise of adoption “exposed to the long horrendous journey to distant foreign countries where these children are not placed in the shelter and Relief Houses, but in course of time they become beggars or prostitutes for want of proper care from their alleged foster parents. Being public interest litigation, the letter was treated as a writ petition.
HELD :-
Stephanie Joan Becker V/s State and Ors.
Citations: AIR2013SC3495, 2013(6)ALD3, 2013(2)ALLMR(SC)489, 2013 (97) ALR 467, 2013(2)ALT52, 2013 2 AWC1119SC, 2013(2)BomCR539
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 – Sections 7 and 26–Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000–Section 41(3) read with Rule 33 of 2007 Rules–Inter-country adoption–Application by appellant to court for appointing her as guardian of female orphan child aged about 10 years–Another application for permission of court to take child out of country for adoption–Application rejected by trial court–And High Court did not interfere–Adoption process spelt out under Guidelines, adhered to–Expert bodies also in favour of adoption of child–Appellant could not be said disqualified or disentitled to relief sought by her–Impugned orders set aside–Appellant appointed as legal guardian of female child with necessary directions.
5) In the Below mentioned judgement, Bombay High Court stated that the PAP’s can adopt a child of the same gender under certain circumstances.
6) In a Recent case, Supreme Court bench of Justices Vikramajit Sen and Abhay Manohar recognized unwed mothers as the legal guardian of her child and further held that she cannot be forced to name the father, nor does she need his consent, while deciding guardianship rights.
The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views / position of RKS Associate, but remains a probable view. For any further queries or follow up please contact RKS Associate at admin@rksassociate.com